Kansas Severe Mental Illness Resources & Helpful Info

KAN. STAT. ANN. § 59-2953(a). Any law enforcement officer who has a reasonable belief formed upon investigation that a person is a mentally ill person and because of such person’s mental illness is likely to cause harm to self or others if allowed to remain at liberty may take the person into custody without a warrant. (…) [T]he officer shall transport the person to a treatment facility where the person shall be examined by a physician or psychologist on duty at the treatment facility. KAN. STAT. ANN. § 59-2954(c). A treatment facility may admit and detain any person presented for emergency observation and treatment upon the written application of any individual, except that a state psychiatric hospital shall not admit and detain any such person, unless a written statement from a qualified mental health professional authorizing such admission to a state psychiatric hospital has been obtained. KAN. STAT. ANN. § 59-2958 (a) At the time the petition for the determination of whether a person is a mentally ill person subject to involuntary commitment for care and treatment under this act is filed, or any time thereafter prior to the trial upon the petition …, the petitioner may request in writing that the district court issue an ex parte emergency order including either or both of the following: (1) An order directing any law enforcement officer to take the person named in the order into custody and transport the person to a designated treatment facility or other suitable place willing to receive and detain the person; or (2) an order authorizing any named treatment facility or other place to detain or continue to detain the person until the further order of the court or until the ex parte emergency custody order shall expire. … (e) An ex parte emergency custody order issued under this section shall expire at 5:00 p.m. of the third day the district court is open for the transaction of business after the date of its issuance and the expiration date shall be stated in the order.

KAN. STAT. ANN. § 59-2957(a). A verified petition to determine whether or not a person is a mentally ill person subject to involuntary commitment for care and treatment under this act may be filed in the district court of the county wherein that person resides or wherein such person may be found. [Ed. Note: Statute places no limitation upon whom may petition the court.] KAN. STAT. ANN. § 59-2966(a). Upon the completion of the trial, if the court or jury finds by clear and convincing evidence that the proposed patient is a mentally ill person subject to involuntary commitment for care and treatment under this act, the court shall order treatment for such person for a specified period of time not to exceed three months from the date of the trial at a treatment facility[.]. KAN. STAT. ANN. § 59-2946(e). "Mentally ill person" means any person who is suffering from a mental disorder which is manifested by a clinically significant behavioral or psychological syndrome or pattern and associated with either a painful symptom or an impairment in one or more important areas of functioning, and involving substantial behavioral, psychological or biological dysfunction, to the extent that the person is in need of treatment. KAN. STAT. ANN. § 59-2946(f) (1) "Mentally ill person subject to involuntary commitment for care and treatment" means a mentally ill person … who also lacks capacity to make an informed decision concerning treatment, is likely to cause harm to self or others, and whose diagnosis is not solely one of the following mental disorders: Alcohol or chemical substance abuse; antisocial personality disorder; intellectual disability; organic personality syndrome; or an organic mental disorder. (2) "Lacks capacity to make an informed decision concerning treatment" means that the person, by reason of the person's mental disorder, is unable, despite conscientious efforts at explanation, to understand basically the nature and effects of hospitalization or treatment or is unable to engage in a rational decision-making process regarding hospitalization or treatment, as evidenced by an inability to weigh the possible risks and benefits. (3) "Likely to cause harm to self or others" means that the person, by reason of the person's mental disorder: (A) Is likely, in the reasonably foreseeable future, to cause substantial physical injury or physical abuse to self or others or substantial damage to another's property, as evidenced by behavior threatening, attempting or causing such injury, abuse or damage; except that if the harm threatened, attempted or caused is only harm to the property of another, the harm must be of such a value and extent that the state's interest in protecting the property from such harm outweighs the person's interest in personal liberty; or (B) is substantially unable, except for reason of indigency, to provide for any of the person's basic needs, such as food, clothing, shelter, health or safety, causing a substantial deterioration of the person's ability to function on the person's own. No person who is being treated by prayer in the practice of the religion of any church that teaches reliance on spiritual means alone through prayer for healing shall be determined to be a mentally ill person subject to involuntary commitment for care and treatment under this act unless substantial evidence is produced upon which the district court finds that the proposed patient is likely in the reasonably foreseeable future to cause substantial physical injury or physical abuse to self or others or substantial damage to another’s property, as evidenced by behavior threatening, attempting or causing such injury, abuse or damage; except that if the harm threatened, attempted or caused is only harm to the property of another, the harm must be of such a value and extent that the state’s interest in protecting the property from such harm outweighs the person’s interest in personal liberty.

In addition to the above inpatient criteria: KAN. STAT. ANN. § 59-2967 (a) An order for outpatient treatment may be entered by the court at any time in lieu of any type of order which would have required inpatient care and treatment if the court finds that the patient: (1) Will meet the criteria for required inpatient care and treatment in the proximate future without such outpatient treatment and is only likely to attend outpatient treatment if there is a court order mandating such treatment; or (2) is, if left untreated, reasonably expected to experience an increase in the symptoms caused by the illness that would result in the need for inpatient care and treatment in the proximate future and whose mental illness has previously caused the patient to refuse needed and appropriate mental health services in the community. …. (c) If outpatient treatment is ordered, the order may state specific conditions to be followed by the patient, but shall include the general condition that the patient is required to comply with all directives and treatment as required by the head of the outpatient treatment facility or the head’s designee. Such directives and treatment plans shall be provided to the court in writing within 10 business days after the order for outpatient treatment is issued. Failure to provide such directives and treatment plans to the court as required by this subsection is not grounds for dismissal of the order unless the failure is made in bad faith. The court may also make such orders as are appropriate to provide for monitoring the patient’s progress and compliance with outpatient treatment. Within any outpatient order for treatment the court shall specify the period of treatment as provided for in K.S.A. 59-2966(a) [not to exceed three months] or 59-2969(f) [continued order not to exceed six months], and amendments thereto.